Scotia’s Mike Hocking Calls Out Continental Gold… With Bad Math (TSX:CNL)

On November 17th, Continental Gold Ltd. (TSX: CNL) published a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) of its development-stage Buriticá gold project in Colombia. It was a fantastic report: the mine expected to produce 4.8 Moz of gold, with annual production of 314,000 at industry-low cash costs of US$389/oz over the first five full years.

That meant that at a gold price assumption of US $1,200/oz, the Buritica project was estimated to have a post-tax net asset value discounted at 5% of US$1.08 billion and an after-tax internal rate of return of 31.5%. That’s big news in an industry that has a dearth of significant-size development projects with robust margins and low capital costs.

However, two days later, on November 19th, Mike Hocking of Scotiabank controversially called into question a number of the company’s calculations, suggesting that:

“Either the cut-off grade or the stated dilution number appears to be incorrect. The PEA news release has outlined a resource of 20.1Mt at a diluted head grade of 7.8 g/t Au and 19.4 g/t Ag at a stated COG of 3 g/t and total dilution of 58% at a nil grade. This implies that the mine plan incorporates a small subset (33%) of the total resource at a much higher cut-off grade than 3g/t used for the resource or that the mill feed has a lower quantity of dilution than the stated 58%…

If it is indeed a smaller subset of the resource we estimate that the undiluted ore tonnes total 8.4Mt at 18.6 g/t Au and 46.1 g/t Ag for 5 Moz Au and 12.5 Moz Ag, before recoveries. This implies that the remaining 16.7Mt, containing 2Moz in the resource have an uneconomic undiluted grade of 3.6 g/t Au and 16.5 g/t Ag and will not be included in our valuation, even as near term option value (i.e. on a $/oz basis).”

-Scotiabank research report dated November 19, 2014

But, unfortunately, his argument is based on a misguided understanding of what dilution is.

Leading mining analyst, Daniel Earle, from TD Securities, cleared up the confusion created in a note to clients when he detailed how companies calculate mine plans from existing resource estimates. He pointed out that with a mine plan totaling 20.1 Mt at 7.8 g/t, including 58% dilution at zero grade, the mineable resource pre-dilution would have been 20.1/(1+0.58) Mt at 7.8*(1+0.58) g/t = 12.7 Mt at 12.3 g/t and not the much smaller 8.4 Mt that Mike Hocking came up with.

Daniel Earle concluded that the PEA results did not raise questions relative to the stated resources – that is, if you get the math right.

Comments are closed.

If you would like to receive our free newsletter via email, simply enter your email address below & click subscribe.


 Daily Gainers

 Lincoln Minerals Limited LML.AX +125.00%
 Golden Cross Resources Ltd. GCR.AX +33.33%
 Casa Minerals Inc. CASA.V +30.00%
 Athena Resources Ltd. AHN.AX +22.22%
 Adavale Resources Limited ADD.AX +22.22%
 Azimut Exploration Inc. AZM.V +21.98%
 New Stratus Energy Inc. NSE.V +21.05%
 Dynasty Gold Corp. DYG.V +18.42%
 Azincourt Energy Corp. AAZ.V +18.18%
 Gladiator Resources Limited GLA.AX +17.65%

Download the latest Solaris Resources (SLSSF) Investor Kit

You have successfully subscribed to the newsletter

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

MiningFeeds will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.